Though if you always backup at the same time that the client systems backup, you might be backing up corrupted data every time, which again leads to an unverified backup is not really a backup, and given the nature of the files you’re backing up, you can only verify that the data is identical to your source data, corrupted or not. Versioning could help mitigate the above to some degree, as in if you backup a corrupted repository, you can still revert to an older, hopefully good, version. So, I really only need to copy that data to a cloud without versioning. You could argue that a verified copy is a valid backup, but automated synchronization could easily copy a partial backup operation. If one of those repositories become corrupted, you’re just backing up corrupted data. Most of the data on my NAS is archives backed up from client systems using proprietary applications that take care of the incrementing, dedupe, versioning, and compression locally.Ī backup of a backup is not really a backup. I'd be happy to reconsider Backblaze once they've improved their EU/UK server infrastructure and portability between buckets. I do like Backblaze and B2, but the limitations of your service mean I need to find another service. I post this to inform other users who might have similar needs and to inform Backblaze. Unlike B2, Wasabi allows you to create buckets in different server locations and move data between differing geolocated buckets. The Wasabi web interface is impressive and functional. Having a land connection to a local server is faster and more reliable. ![]() This is important because from the UK, EU servers require that data travel across the submarine cables through the North Sea. Wasabi has many EU servers, including several in the UK (as opposed to Amsterdam or Germany). Even more important, their EU/UK servers are very fast. They cost me a few pennies more than B2, but with no retrieval or other fees. I had used Wasabi several years ago and found them to be pretty competent. I am now using Wasabi ( ) and all I can say is w.o.w. 13 Best Amazon S3 Alternatives Radically Cheaper By Syed Balal Rumy - In the ever-evolving digital landscape, businesses of all sizes have realized the importance of dependable, secure, and cost-effective cloud storage solutions. I've tried iDrive three times in the past 15 years.never again. iDrive offered me 10TB for about $3.50 a month, so I gave them a chance. I wasn't happy about that, but I liked B2, so I started the process, but I found that the B2 EU server was actually slower than the U.S. The only solution was to create a new account, choose the EU server, and start over with my complete cloud upload. I wasn't aware that I could not move my B2 data from their US servers to their EU server in Amsterdam. Most of the data on my NAS is archives backed up from client systems using proprietary applications that take care of the incrementing, dedupe, versioning, and compression locally. I backup up about 4TB of data to the cloud as a worst-case recovery option. Badly designed UI's, incorrect count and storage data, and slow response from support eventually made me realize that iDrive was a mistake. I recently posted an article about moving from Backblaze to with some reasons why it seemed to be a good idea for me. Since I’m far from being the first to try the duplicati/B2 setup, I suppose I should make it work.Ĭould it be that since I’m testing backblaze as a free user, my puts are not treated as top priority ? I guess not since that would defeat the hole point of testing for free.Okay, time to eat some crow. I tried to backup the same data in a local folder and in wasabi without any problem. : Error: SecureChannelFailure (Remote prematurely closed connection.) -> System.IO.IOException: Remote prematurely closed connection.Įdit : last time i tried to run the backup, it wouldn’t start: Unexpected difference in fileset version 1: 3:14:31 PM (database id: 1), found 1124 entries, but expected 1757 ![]() : Operation Put with file attempt 2 of 5 failed with message: Error: SecureChannelFailure (Remote prematurely closed connection.) : Error getting response stream (ReadDoneAsync2): ReceiveFailure : Operation Put with file attempt 4 of 5 failed with message: Error getting response stream (ReadDoneAsync2): ReceiveFailure I then activated logging, and found a lot of retries such as : The error message is not always the same. It seems to upload data from what the network monitor shows, but never until the end. I use debian bullseye/sid with duplicati 2.0.5.1_beta_. I can’t complete the initial test upload (about 500M). Which is faster and cheaper Backblaze B2 or WasabiThis video compares the backup speeds of two object storage companies: Backblaze B2 in the USA and Wasabi. I’ve been trying b2 backblaze for personal backup as a free user for know.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |